A White House Teleprompter Operator Bet on the President's Words. The CFTC Has Ordered Him to Repay $107,539.
Release 9289-26 applies the misappropriation theory of insider trading to prediction-market event contracts — and hands out the first visible discount under the Enforcement Division's new cooperation advisory.

The short answer
- The CFTC issued a consent order on August 28, 2026 (Release 9289-26) against Gabriel Perez, a teleprompter operator for the White House, over trades on KalshiEX presidential mention market contracts between December 2025 and February 2026.
- The order requires disgorgement of $107,539.02 and a civil monetary penalty of $65,000, imposes a three-year trading ban, and orders him to cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.
- The CFTC says Perez had access to presidential speeches before they were delivered and misappropriated that information in breach of his duty of trust and confidence.
- The penalty includes what the CFTC calls a substantial discount under the Division of Enforcement's new cooperation advisory, because of Perez's exemplary cooperation.
Kalshi lists contracts on whether a public figure will say a particular word. They are called mention markets, and they settle on the text of a speech. Someone who has the text before the speech is given holds the answer. On Friday the Commodity Futures Trading Commission settled with a man who did.
The order
Release 9289-26, dated August 28, 2026, concerns Gabriel Perez, a teleprompter operator for the White House. The CFTC says he traded presidential mention market event contracts on KalshiEX between December 2025 and February 2026. The consent order requires disgorgement of $107,539.02 and a civil monetary penalty of $65,000, bans him from trading for three years, and orders him to cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations. The release is headlined at a rounded total of $172,000.
The agency's description of the conduct is compact: in his position, Perez had access to presidential speeches prior to those speeches being delivered, and he misappropriated that information in breach of his duty of trust and confidence.
The theory being used
That is the misappropriation theory of insider trading, and it is worth noticing what it does not require. There is no company here, no security, and no issuer. What creates the duty is the employment relationship and the confidentiality that attaches to an undelivered speech. The information was not a corporate secret; it was a draft. The CFTC's position is that trading on it in a derivatives market is the same wrong as trading on an earnings figure.
The cooperation discount
The release states that the penalty includes a substantial discount under the Division of Enforcement's new cooperation advisory, because of Perez's exemplary cooperation with the CFTC. That makes this an early visible application of a policy the Division has adopted but which the release does not date or number. The size of the discount is not stated in the release; The Block reports it at roughly 40%.
How it surfaced
CBS News reports that Kalshi's surveillance function flagged trading patterns that deviated from typical behaviour, froze the account, locked more than $90,000 of profits, and referred the matter to the CFTC. The Block reports that Perez opened his Kalshi account on December 8, 2025, and read prepared remarks roughly an hour before delivery before trading; it quotes Kalshi head of enforcement Robert DeNault saying that it does not matter who you are, that violating the exchange's rules or federal law brings consequences. CBS also reports that the White House Management Office wrote to staff in March instructing them not to place prediction-market bets using nonpublic information.
The Block describes this as the second CFTC insider-trading settlement against a federal employee in four weeks, following a settlement with former congressman George Santos on July 31 for approximately $35,000 over Kalshi State of the Union trades.
Why it matters
Event contracts have grown faster than the case law around them. This order says that the ordinary market-abuse framework travels with them: an exchange's surveillance obligations, a duty of trust attaching to information, disgorgement of the profit, a trading ban. The novelty is the underlying asset, not the enforcement. For anyone whose job puts them near a text before it is public, the order is a straightforward statement that the text is material nonpublic information even when it is only a speech.
Sources
- CFTC Orders Gabriel Perez to Pay $172,000 for Insider Trading of Mention Market Event Contracts (Release 9289-26) — U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Former White House teleprompter operator ordered to pay $172,000 for Kalshi trades on mention markets — The Block
- Ex-White House teleprompter operator ordered to pay $172,000 for insider bets on Kalshi — CBS News
Spotted an error? Tell our corrections desk.
How this article was produced
- Responsible desk:
- Crypto & Digital Assets
- Published:
- 31 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC
- Last updated:
- 31 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC
- Verification:
- Figures and quotations checked against primary sources under our fact-checking policy and editorial standards.
- Independence:
- No advertiser or affiliate partner had any involvement in this article — see editorial independence and how we make money.
- Corrections:
- Report a factual error.
This article is general financial information and journalism, not personalised financial, investment, tax or legal advice.
