Skip to content
Connecting live market data
Full board

Personal Finance

Seven Agencies Have Withdrawn the Guidance That Encouraged Special Purpose Credit Programs

The 2022 interagency statement, and related HUD and CFPB documents from 2020 and 2021, were rescinded effective on publication. The Federal Reserve, which signed the original, did not join.

Wallcrest Personal Finance DeskPublished 30 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTCUpdated 30 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC3 min read
Seven Agencies Have Withdrawn the Guidance That Encouraged Special Purpose Credit Programs — Wallcrest Media cover image
Photo: Photo by Ekaterina Bolovtsova / Pexels · Pexels License — free to use, no attribution legally required (credited above as good practice).

The short answer

  • On August 25, 2026 the FDIC, NCUA, OCC, CFPB, HUD, the Department of Justice and the FHFA rescinded the Interagency Statement on Special Purpose Credit Programs Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, dated February 22, 2022.
  • Related HUD and CFPB guidance from 2020 and 2021 was rescinded at the same time, effective on publication in the Federal Register.
  • The agencies say the 2022 statement relied on a version of Regulation B that has since been amended and on HUD guidance no longer in effect, and that its positions cannot be reconciled with the statutory text of ECOA and the Fair Housing Act.
  • The Federal Reserve participated in the 2022 statement but is not among the seven agencies rescinding it.

A special purpose credit program is a lending program aimed at a defined class of borrowers — a down-payment assistance product for a particular area, say, or a small-business loan fund. In February 2022 a group of federal agencies published a statement encouraging lenders to establish them and offering assurances that they were permissible. That statement has now been withdrawn.

What was rescinded, and by whom

Seven agencies signed the rescission notice: the FDIC, the National Credit Union Administration, the OCC, the CFPB, HUD, the Justice Department and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. It withdraws the February 22, 2022 interagency statement together with related HUD and CFPB guidance documents issued in 2020 and 2021, and takes effect on publication in the Federal Register. The Federal Reserve joined the original statement and is not a signatory to the rescission.

The reasons the agencies give

  • The 2022 statement referenced a version of Regulation B that has since been amended.
  • It relied in part on HUD guidance concerning the Fair Housing Act that is no longer in effect.
  • The agencies say the earlier positions cannot be reconciled with the statutory text of ECOA and the Fair Housing Act.
  • The notice states that federal law does not authorise any generalised remedial equity initiatives absent specific cases of unlawful discrimination.
  • It cites executive orders on deregulation and on ending discrimination programs, and the Supreme Court's heightened scrutiny standard for race-based policies.

What lenders are told to do

Creditors should no longer rely on the prior guidance. Programs must comply with ECOA, Regulation B and, where applicable, the Fair Housing Act. The notice rescinds guidance; it does not amend a regulation.

No regulation or interagency statement fixated on the Biden administration's DEI commitments can defeat the Fair Housing Act's categorical prohibition against discriminating on the basis of race and color in any residential real estate-related transaction.
Craig Trainor, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department said in the same announcement that it is illegal to favour individuals for housing benefits, mortgage loans or any credit programs on the basis of protected characteristics such as race.

Why it matters to a borrower

Guidance is not law, and withdrawing it does not by itself close a program. What it removes is the assurance lenders were given in 2022 that these programs were permissible — and lenders price legal uncertainty into whether they keep offering something. Anyone who was counting on a particular down-payment assistance or small-business product is better served asking that lender directly whether it is still on offer than assuming an answer in either direction.

Sources

Spotted an error? Tell our corrections desk.

How this article was produced

Responsible desk:
Personal Finance
Published:
30 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC
Last updated:
30 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC
Verification:
Figures and quotations checked against primary sources under our fact-checking policy and editorial standards.
Independence:
No advertiser or affiliate partner had any involvement in this article — see editorial independence and how we make money.

This article is general financial information and journalism, not personalised financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

Share

ECOARegulation Bspecial purpose credit programsmortgage lendingfair lendingCFPB